Madshrimps News and interesting articles and howtos from the Web!Articles and Reviews, CPU Coolers, Cases, Motherboards, Videocards and more...Howto and guides on Modding and Optimising your PCFollow Interesting Discussions at our Forums!Find out more About Madshrimps and its crewStatistics - What article/howto is most popular and more!
[M]adness
HWFaq Hardware and Software Frequently Asked Questions - HWFaq
Contests Win Hardware! Join our contests now!
Search
Links
Sponsors
Send News
Video Card Comparison Charts

Intel Core i7 In-Depth Performance Scaling Analysis

Aircooled Heatsink Reviews

35x 120mm Fans Tested

Sponsors
.Priorweb
Arctic Silver
Asus
Caseking
CoolerMaster
Danger Den
Dollarshops
Geeks.com
Gigabyte
MSI
OCZ
PC-Cooling
Scythe
Swiftech
Tones
||-More-||
 
 
Mainstream Quad Core Processors Compared from AMD and Intel
Mainstream Quad Core Processors Compared from AMD and Intel
In this review we compare AMD´s latest AM2+ based Phenom X4 9850 to Intel´s mainstream Q9300 Processor. Which one gives you more performance for the buck? Answering this question is not as straightforward as you might think. With AMD aggressive pricing and new B3 revision does it stand a chance against an upgraded Q6600? Let us find out.
Author massman
Editor jmke
Date 2008-04-30
Discuss 4 comment(s)
Print this Article

 
 


  The history of the alternative choice:

Madshrimps (c)


Advanced Micro Devices, or AMD as we know, has been around for quite some time now. In the early personal computer era, Intel had more than one competitor, such as Cyrix and Via, but only one of them is still competing at the highest level: AMD. About ten years ago, when the K5 was released, AMD had to compete price-wise as their chips were not at as fast as Intel's. That decision has been included in AMD's policy ever since, as we all know that AMD produces chips that are meant to be best in the price/performance field rather than pure power.

K7, or Athlon XP, was a big change, as for the first time AMD released processors that were clock per clock faster and cheaper than Intel's solution. Still, AMD kept its prices pretty low and were thus loved by both the usual home user and the hardcore overclocking enthusiast. Released at the end of the year 2001, the Athlon XP-saga continued until May 2003, when the last Barton model, the 3200+ clocked at 2,2GHz, was released. However, AMD was working on a revolutionary chip, one that would let them control the market a bit longer.

K8, the Athlon64, the first desktop 64-bit processor. In September 2003, AMD released a desktop platform, namely the socket 754, which later would be replaced by the socket 939 platform which introduced PCIe lanes and re-introduced dual channel memory, which was abandoned on s754. The new chip featured an IMC, internal memory controller, which made the memory bandwidth skyrocket. The processors were loved as well, Intel did not have an answer ready yet and the prices were reasonable. For the 24/7 overclockers, these cpu's were a dream come true: most of the processors with newer cores, such as the Venice and San Diego, clocked fairly easy to 3GHz on air cooling. For the hardcore enthusiast, these chips were not that great as the IMC introduced the coldbug which basically comes down to the processor failing to work when temperatures got too low.




Madshrimps (c)


January 06, the reign of AMD was over. Intel introduced the first 'Intel core' series processors, the Yonah, which simply blew the A64 away, especially overclocking-wise (little anecdote: Madshrimps reviewer, Gamer, was one of the first to test the Yonah subzero, which lead him to the Superpi 1M WR). Later on, the Core2 series were introduced: Allendale, Conroe and Kentsfield, each faster than its predecessor. With the Kentsfield, Intel introduced the first desktop quad core processing unit, well ... two dual cores under one IHS. The performance was, astonishing enough, pretty good, although no one really needed a quad core at that moment, as almost no software supported four cores. Just a few months ago, Intel released the 45nm based Core2Duo/Quadro cpu's, already tested by Madshrimps here.

In the meanwhile, AMD introduced AM2, a new processor platform, but never could compete with Intel when it comes to performance. Although price-wise still nearly unbeatable (only the high-end chips were pretty expensive), AMD saw the sales go down and had to introduce a new processor: K10, also known as the Phenom series. They've worked quite some time to get the chip work good at higher frequencies, but still are stuck at about 2-2,5GHz stock, while Intel is able to release products clocked at 3Ghz and higher. The new technology did not rock our world; the chip was not noticeable faster than Intel, the mainboards were unstable, the B2 revision had a terrible TLB-bug, the cold bug did not disappear... this all according to observations and reading articles on the world wide web.

BUT, the latest Phenom was recently introduced which fixes the TLB-bug, comes at higher clockspeeds and better pricing. So now instead of ranting on about AMD, we decided to try and get our hands on the new silicon to get it a twirl. Straight from AMD we received the latest: Phenom X4 9850, the high-end B3 revision processor, in this performance review we will compare it to the Intel Q9300, Intel's similarly priced quad core CPU so see what the new Phenom X4 revision has to offer to the average Joe, as well as the hardware enthusiast.

In the following pages, we'll compare both in a series of benchmarks: 2D, 3D and games. Further on, we'll inform you about the overclocking and finish with the final verdict.

On with the show ->

| Next ->>




Quick Page Jump:

More reviews in this category can be found below:

  • Intel Clarkdale CPU Overclocking With IGP Enabled - Reaching High BCLK
  • Intel Clarkdale vs AMD Phenom II with 785G – Mainstream Showdown
  • Intel Core i5 750 Review - Overclocking Phase-Change vs LN2
  • Intel Pentium E6300 Best bang for the buck ? Cache test revisited
  • Intel Core 2 Duo E7400 vs E8600: The battle of the caches!
  • Intel Core i7 920 and 965 XE CPU Review
  • AMD Phenom X3: One too little or one too much?
  • Mainstream Quad Core Processors Compared from AMD and Intel
  • Intel SkullTrail Super High End PC Platform Review
  • Intel Core 2 Duo E8500 45nm Wolfdale CPU Review
  •  
     


    Copyright © 2001-2010 Madshrimps / JMkeOC.com, All rights reserved.
    Graphical Design by Dennis Kestelle, Programming by John Meys, Paul Meys and Frederik Colardyn, Overall Site design by John Meys

    All information and graphics contained in Madshrimps are sole property of the Madshrimps crew and may not be reproduced or copied in any manner without written permission from us.

    BTW-BE 0888919678

    ADS by G
     
     
     
     

    Search Madshrimps
     
     
    Google
    Search Madshrimps:

     
     

    Daily News
     
      Hardware TPM Hacked...
    Chinese Site Copies...
    Configure Your Comp...
    Seagate debuts the ...
    AMD to Sample 32 nm...
    NVIDIA Optimus - Tr...
    Windows 7 Battery N...
    Asus jumps the gun,...
    MSI Shows Passive C...
    AMD's ATI Radeon HD...
    Intel's Sandy Bridg...
    Intel Core i7 660UM...
    AMD reveals Fusion ...
    MSI P55-GD55: A Mai...
    AMD Reveals More Ll...
    AMD’s Radeon HD 557...
    Gigabyte HD 5670 OC...
    Sapphire HD 5570 1 ...
    Powercolor HD 5870 ...
    [M] MSI P55-GD80 en...

    Syndicate Madshrimps Daily News with our XML/RSS Feed!

    Receive updates by e-mail

    Read more News...
     
     

    Sponsor Space:
     
     
     
     

    New Content
     
      Articles/Reviews:
    USB 3.0 and SATA 6G...
    MSI Wind U135 Revie...
    Intel Clarkdale CPU...
    Three AMD 785G Moth...
    Vidabox Premium Wir...
    OCZ Throttle 32Gb e...
    Seven Intel P55 Mot...
    RAID 0 Stripe Sizes...
    Gigabyte Geforce GT...
    Intel Clarkdale vs ...
    Swiftech Apogee XT ...
    LanCool PC-K58 ATX ...
    Larkooler Universal...
    MSI GTX 275 Lightni...
    MSI Geforce GTX 275...

    Howto and Guides:
    Building a 300W Fan...
    NVIDIA Geforce 8400...
    NVIDIA Geforce 8800...
    Reviving and Volt M...
    Protect the core of...